New Feature: Edit This!

As the official publication of the STC Technical Editing SIG, Corrigo is full of useful information for technical editing practitioners.

But one of the best ways to improve our editing skills is to actually edit a challenging piece of text, and then see how we did. Having our own work checked can be both beneficial and eye-opening.

Throughout 2024-2025, Corrigo will be running a monthly feature called Edit This!, in which we will post a link to the New York Times’s Copy Edit This! quiz, written by Philip B. Corbett. Corbett is the associate managing editor for standards at The New York Times, and oversees The Times’s style manual and handles questions about the language used in The Times.

To make it easier for you to find these quizzes again in the future, they will be tagged with an Edit This tag, and the titles prefaced with the same phrase.

Introduction to Technical Editing Course

Meg Vezzu

Are you looking to learn more about technical editing and the skills needed to succeed in this area? Perhaps you have recently started a job in technical editing or are considering a career in the field. Or maybe your job involves editing technical documents for colleagues or clients and you would like to expand your knowledge or brush up on your skills. If any of this sounds like you, you may be interested in signing up for the course “Introduction to Technical Editing.” The next session of this six-week course will begin on April 8, 2024.

In this course, we will dive into a variety of topics related to technical editing and cover important skills that technical editors need to effectively advocate for the audience and help technical writers to produce content that is clear, organized, and useful.

The course will begin with an overview of technical editing, including the different types and levels of technical editing and important skills needed for this type of work. We will also go over tips for managing editing projects and establishing positive working relationships with writers. Next, we will learn about the different tools technical editors use to do their job, such as tools for electronic text markup (e.g., Microsoft Word track changes and Adobe Acrobat markup) and the style manuals used by different industries (e.g., APA, Chicago). In addition to an overview of grammar and mechanics that will focus on common errors, we will discuss strategies for editing for clarity, conciseness, and style, including reducing redundancy and wordiness, using active vs. passive voice, and editing according to plain language guidelines. We will also cover topics related to editing for visual design, such as use of fonts, color, graphics, figures, and tables, in addition to issues related to accessibility. Finally, we will talk about some special considerations in technical editing, including technical editing in a global context, bias-free language, and ethical issues.

The course is presented in an asynchronous format, with lesson videos posted at the beginning of each week. There will also be at least one optional live session scheduled where students can ask questions in real time. Additionally, there will be discussion forums in Moodle where students can ask questions or share information.

Students will have the opportunity to apply the skills learned in the class through weekly assignments. Some of these will involve editing content provided by the instructor, and other assignments will allow students to find content for editing (e.g., websites). The course culminates with a final assignment where students perform a comprehensive edit of a proposal.

This course is ideal for those who are just getting started in technical editing as well as those who may have some job-related experience but are looking for more formal instruction to hone their skills.

To find out more and to sign up for the course, visit https://www.stc.org/course/tech-editing-april-2024/.

Newbies’ Corner: Monthly TESIG Student Chats

One of the goals of the TESIG is to help technical editing students get more involved in the field. We want to hear some new, fresh voices, especially from those who are studying the subject or just starting out.  It’s important to us to discuss the needs, dreams, and issues of the next generation of technical editing practitioners.

With this goal in mind, we are excited to announce the TESIG Monthly Student Chat series!

These 30-minute virtual chats will be held over Zoom on the last Wednesday of each month, and are a forum for current TESIG student members to discuss editing challenges, as well as share helpful resources, editing tactics and tips, and career advice about finding internships/jobs.

For details, please contact student_outreach@stc-techedit.org.

Book Review: Proof Positive – How to Find Errors Before They Embarrass You

by Noel Atzmiller

Proof Positive – How to Find Errors Before They Embarrass You
By Karen L. Anderson
©1996 by SkillPath Publications. Mission, Kansas (193 pages)

I recently found a job that requires me to perform extensive proofreading/editing of technical documents. Before I started, I wanted to obtain some guidance and tips on how I could perform my tasks well.

I visited a local used bookstore, scanned their shelves, and found a book titled Proof Positive. After glancing at the Table of Contents and reading several random pages, I knew I found just what I needed. Although book was printed in 1996, inside this document was information crafted to encourage and equip a person to become an excellent proofreader.

Now, I know you might wonder if a book that focuses on proofreading is applicable for editors. I think it is. The proofreader helps to make sure the document author follows the rules determined by an editor. By detecting and correcting infractions within an accepted code of language content, the proofreader is working with an editor and enabling the author to produce the best possible document.

The author of this book, Karen Anderson, is a nationally recognized writer, trainer, and communications consultant. As the owner of her own consulting firm, she has taught business professionals techniques for producing polished, quality documents.

Her extensive knowledge is found within the first pages of the document, where she provides practical answers to crucial questions that a proofreader must know, such as:

  • “How can a proofreader prepare to proofread successfully?” p.9
  • “Where will a proofreader find the most errors in documents?” p.19
  • “How can a proofreader do a good job when there is too little time before the deadline?” p. 25

Anderson continues by offering several clever techniques to find errors in a document. She recommends reading text backward, starting with the last word in a paragraph and moving to the beginning, to help find spelling and usage errors. Holding a single-sided copy up to a light with the print facing away from view reveals mistakes with short words and poor formatting. Locating hyphenation and leading issues is possible by rotating a hard copy 90 degrees with the right margin pointing up.

Anderson also provides chapters that explain correct grammar and review punctuation guidelines, but she avoids a stodgy recitation of rules. She offers short exercises that give the reader an opportunity to practice the guidelines she proposes.

Poor verbal habits can also creep into documents. Errors can occur because the proofreader thought a sentence “sounded right” and “looked” correct. Anderson reacts to this by listing corrections to many common mistakes and guidance on avoiding poor word choice, redundant words, wordiness, jargon and cliches.

The copious advice in the document culminates in a chapter that details some tools a proofreader can use to track their documents for error-free publication. Tracking slips, error logs, and a personalized proofreader checklist are just a few of these practical tools.

Five appendixes include information on proofreader marks, commonly misspelled words, misused words, transitions, and type specifications.

The only downside of the book is that it focuses entirely on printed documents; it does not provide guidance for proofreading web-based text. However, many of the tips and guidelines can still be used for non-print documentation.

Throughout the document, Anderson conveys repeated encouragement to the proofreader. This feature and the numerous tips and guidelines make Proof Positive a valuable reference for beginning or experienced proofreaders.

This book is available on Amazon (amazon.com), AbeBooks (abebooks.com), and other online book sellers. Check it out!

Conversation Starter: How Do You Feel About the Singular “They”?

Editor’s Note: As part of our Conversation Starter feature, we present what we hope is the first part of an ongoing discussion about the evolution of the English language, especially the use of gender-neutral pronouns.

Want to join the conversation? Email your thoughts to editor@stc-techedit.org, or write them in the Comments section at the end of this article. We’ll publish them in future issues.

Professor Jo Mackiewicz and Allison Durazzi of Iowa State University are studying how editors make editorial decisions about issues related to gender, and have put together a short survey about the use of the singular pronoun “they.” The findings of this study can help editors better understand how other editors make editorial decisions related to gender and pronouns.

This survey is a much shorter and easier-to-use version than one they distributed previously, and they think (or, at least, hope) that it will be thought provoking. It should take approximately 5 to 10 minutes, depending on the detail you provide in your responses.

To participate in this study, go to: https://iastate.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2gdfd9eFWxBayb4

If you have any questions, please contact Prof. Mackiewicz (jomack@iastate.edu).